Title Insurance and Trust Co. v. Lusk
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the city council of the city of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
It appears from the petition and affidavit filed that heretofore, in 1907, under the provisions of the street improvement act of 1903 [Stats. 1903, c. 268], the city council of Los Angeles duly adopted an ordinance declaring its intention to order the widening of Eighth street, between Main street and Central avenue; said ordinance further designated the land necessary and convenient to be taken for such improvement, and fixed the boundaries of the assessment district, within which was included the property benefited by such improvement; that this ordinance was approved and published, and was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Tuttle v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Clute v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- S. M. Bernard Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912