Legal Opinion
People v. Ambrose
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1953PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
122 Cal.App.2d Supp. 966 (1953)
THE PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
M. F. AMBROSE et al., Appellants.
California Court of Appeals.
December 31, 1953.
James M. Thuesen for Appellants.
C. M. Ozias, Denver C. Peckinpah and Charles F. Hamlin for Respondent.
CONLEY, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment convicting them of the violation of an ordinance of the city of Fresno, which forbids the conducting of gambling games. Two points were raised on the appeal; first, it is contended that the evidence does not justfy the verdict of guilty; and, secondly, it is urged that one of the instructions was erroneus.
[1] The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re PortnoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re LowrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Sullivan v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Western Telcon, Inc. v. California State LotteryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Kelly v. First Astri Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Trinkle v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.