Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Parratt
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 16, 1981No. CV80-L-261 to CV80-L-263PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
URBOM, Chief Judge.
I
Nature of the Case
The petitioners seek writs of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the grounds of denial of effective assistance of counsel in their state criminal trial and that their guilty pleas there were not voluntarily and intelligently made.
II
Facts
The petitioners Bishop and Davis were arrested in December, 1975, at the Drake Court Apartments in Omaha, Nebraska, as suspects in connection with two robberies committed with the use of firearms. The petitioner Yates was arrested that same evening in an alley near the Drake Court Apartments.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Veal v. WolffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- State v. SolanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Walker v. GarringtonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
- State v. SolanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985