Legal Opinion
State v. Solano
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 1, 1985No. 1 CA-CR 8319, 1 CA-CR 8306PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal by Richard Solano and Vickie Hurst Solano of their convictions and sentences pursuant to plea agreements. On appeal they claim that their contingent plea bargains were illegal. We agree. Therefore we set aside their plea agreements, vacate the convictions and sentences and remand the cases for further proceedings.
On September 6, 1983, a search warrant was executed on a home and 1382 grams of *42480% to 95% pure cocaine and 2 baggies of marijuana were confiscated. Three people, co-defendants Richard Solano, Vickie Hurst and Guy Shane Lindstrom, were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. EthingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SolanoArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. JaramilloArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Kelly Hamilton v. Samuel Lewis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. SolanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- State v. SolanoArizona Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.