Liegey Trustee v. Clearfield Tex.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
The controversy out of which this appeal arose is between forty-eight female employees and their employer, Clearfield Textile Company. The company operates a plant for the manufacture and production of woven fabrics; the employees operated loom machines upon which they wove a velvet fabric, known in the trade as “Pile Warp,” their wages being fixed at a specified rate for each yard produced. Each machine was equipped with a mechanical device, commonly called a clock, which purported, to indicate accurately the number of yards woven by its operator. The employees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- West, Admrx. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Lesser v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cole v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Schulz v. SchulzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Drawbaugh v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1952
- Johnson v. Benjamin Franklin Hotel Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1943
- Kerr v. PattersonDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.