Legal Opinion

Liegey Trustee v. Clearfield Tex.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1941No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The controversy out of which this appeal arose is between forty-eight female employees and their employer, Clearfield Textile Company. The company operates a plant for the manufacture and production of woven fabrics; the employees operated loom machines upon which they wove a velvet fabric, known in the trade as “Pile Warp,” their wages being fixed at a specified rate for each yard produced. Each machine was equipped with a mechanical device, commonly called a clock, which purported, to indicate accurately the number of yards woven by its operator. The employees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. West, Admrx. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Lesser v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cole v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Schulz v. SchulzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Drawbaugh v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1952
  4. Johnson v. Benjamin Franklin Hotel Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1943
  5. Kerr v. PattersonDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API