Legal Opinion

Young v. Bradford County Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1942No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This is the fourth time the subject of this litigation has been presented in this court. The question is whether three notes made by and secured by a mortgage given by defendant telephone company to Jerome K. Packard November 1, 1927, are valid. The mortgagor-maker alleges want of consideration in violation of Article XYI, section 7, of the Constitution. The first suit was a bill by the mortgagor against Packard’s administrator for the cancellation of the notes and the satisfaction of the mortgage on the ground stated. The bill was dismissed: Bradford County…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Bradford County Telephone Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Young, Adm'r v. Bradford County T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of IsraelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Doe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Kine v. FormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Sanderbeck v. SanderbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API