Lomish v. Morris Nimelstein Sportswear Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
Morris Nimelstein Sportswear Company, Inc.,' appellant, is the defendant in an action in assumpsit instituted by George Lomish, appellee. The corporation filed a rule upon Lomish for the production of books and records in his possession for inspection by it. This rule was discharged. Subsequent thereto appellant filed its bill in equity for discovery averring, inter alia, that it had a full and complete defense by way of set-off and counterclaim in that the parties in 1947, orally agreed to become partners; that each was to devote his full time to the partnership…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peoples City Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Lesser v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Compton v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Estate of RoartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kuhlman Electric Co. v. Donegal Manufacturing Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1952
- Northumberland County v. Gap Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1957
- Perry v. Niedringhaus, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.