Legal Opinion
Liberty v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1982No. 80-406PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner challenges as unsupported by substantial evidence the findings and conclusions of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board (the Board) that his permanent employment disability was neither caused nor aggravated by his performance of duties as a patrolman. We affirm. 1
Former Metropolitan Police Department Officer James L. Liberty, petitioner, appears before this court for the second time. In an earlier appeal, Liberty v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191 (1979), petitioner argued that certain findings of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Liberty v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dowd v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Davis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Spielman v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lloyd's Window Products Co. v. District of Columbia Minority Business Opportunity CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Estrom v. Burban, No. 311344 (Sep. 10, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991