Vessels v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Vessels sued for false arrest. The trial court granted summary judgment for appellees, the District of Columbia (the District) and Eleganza, Inc. (Eleganza). On appeal appellant urges separate grounds for reversal as to each appellee. First, he claims the trial court erred in failing, sua sponte, to discover a disputed issue of fact now urged as requiring a trial of his case against the District. Second, he argues that a correct reading of the law of false arrest bars summary judgment for Eleganza. We reject appellant’s first contention and therefore affirm…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Nicholas Acoustics & Specialty Company v. H & M Construction Company, Inc. And Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Williams v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chase v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Smith v. Union Labor Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.