Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rodriguez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2002No. 01-0643PublishedCited by 348 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

We must decide whether Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. may be liable for false imprisonment because of its failure to disclose to the district attorney that its check identification system could provide inaccurate information, resulting in the arrest of innocent persons. The trial court said no. But the court of appeals said yes, and reversed the trial court’s summary judgment for Wal-Mart. 1 We hold that Wal-Mart cannot be held hable for false imprisonment because there is no evidence that it knowingly provided the district attorney with false information intending that Martin Rodriguez be arrested.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Flameout Design & Fabrication, Inc. v. Pennzoil Caspian Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  3. Morgan v. AnthonyTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. LieckTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Halbert v. City of Sherman, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by348 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Forbes Inc. v. Granada Biosciences, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. Hackberry Creek Country Club, Inc. v. Hackberry Creek Home Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006

343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API