Municipal Leas. Sys., Inc. v. Northampton Nat. Bk. of Easton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a cause of action. The motion will be granted.
The amended complaint contains five counts. The jurisdictional and factual basis for the asserted claims are not entirely clear from the amended complaint, but defendant raises no issue as to whether the amended complaint is sufficiently definite to comply with Fed.R. Civ.P. 8(a).
Counts I, II and III allege “liability” under 12 U.S.C. § 86, which provides a cause of action for recovery of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc. v. The Marquette National Bank of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Brierley v. Commercial Credit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc. v. Marquette National BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Brierley v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rynearson v. First Nat. Bank of RochesterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
- Valente v. DennisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977