Legal Opinion

Brierley v. Commercial Credit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 17, 1930No. 4357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is an action at law instituted October 13, 1927, by Joseph H. Brierley and Arthur J. Fleming, receivers of William H. Lori-mer’s Sons Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, to recover $54,328.51, with interest, alleged to be usurious paid by William H. Lori-mer’s Sons Company, referred to hereinafter as Lorimer, to the Commercial Credit Company, a Delaware corporation, in the course of business from 1919 to 1927. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was directed to be entered for the defendant. From this order, the plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. In Re LoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Bedford v. Eastern Building and Loan Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fahs v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. In Re GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Frank S. Blackford, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Munro-Van Helms Company v. Commercial Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Fahs v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API