Christensen v. City of Pocatello
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
The Christensens and Fairchilds initiated this action to prevent the City of Pocatello from extending its Portneuf Greenway, a biking and walking path, over an unopened road and an easement, both of which traverse their property. The City counterclaimed, seeking an order allowing it to proceed with the Greenway extension. After deciding some of the issues on summary judgment and conducting a bench trial on other issues, the district court ruled in favor of the City, issuing an order allowing the City to proceed with its plans. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Harper Road…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bream v. BenscoterIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Carson v. City of GeneseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Penn Bowling Recreation Center, Inc. v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Foster's, Inc. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gem State Insurance v. HutchisonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Hughes v. George B. Fisher, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Coward v. HadleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- HP Ltd. Partnership v. Kenai River Airpark, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Thornton v. PandreaIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.