Legal Opinion

Coward v. Hadley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2010No. 36981PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Charles and Anne Coward appeal from the trial court’s decision following a bench trial that they do not have either an express or implied easement over an alleyway connecting their home to a public street through the rear of Crystal Hadley’s lot. Crystal Hadley cross-appeals the district court’s refusal to grant attorney fees below.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This controversy surrounds three neighboring residential lots in the Law’s Second Addition in Sandpoint, Idaho. Lot 1, which is owned by Crystal Hadley, Respondent, sits on a corner with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Curlee v. Kootenai County Fire & RescueIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hogg v. WolskeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Garner v. PoveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. H.F.L.P., LLC v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Robert Siegwarth v. Opportunity Management Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API