Legal Opinion
Barbarich v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1932No. 6,899PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
In June, 1930, Wellington D. Bankin, Esq., commenced an action against the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Bailway Company to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff, Tony Barbarieh, while in the employ of the defendant company. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint on the sole ground that causes of action were therein improperly united, and plaintiff was granted time within Which to amend, but no amended complaint was filed.
Negotiations between Attorney Rankin and A. N. Whitlock, of counsel for the defendant company, finally resulted in an offer by the latter to pay…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Moers v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Babcock & Russell v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- Reilly v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Capps v. Georgia Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- National Surety Co. of New York v. UlmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- In re the Estate of SidmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Goggins v. BookoutMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- Davis v. Sullivan Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.