Legal Opinion
United States v. Navarro
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 9, 1997No. CR. S-94-390 LKKPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
Movant filed the instant suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He claims that the Special Assistant United States Attorney appearing in the criminal case underlying this litigation was without authority to represent the United States during the relevant period, and accordingly, this court lacked jurisdiction to entertain that prosecution.
The matter was briefed, an evidentiary hearing was held, argument was heard and the matter was taken under submission. It is disposed of herein.
I
FACTS
At all times relevant herein, Dale Kitching was a Deputy District…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Anthony NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. NavarroDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
- United States v. HubbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.