Legal Opinion
United States v. Navarro
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 20, 1997No. CR S-94-390 LKKPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
This matter is once again before the court, this time on the government’s motion to reconsider the court’s order granting the motion made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissing the underlying indictment. The facts relevant to the order are set forth in the court’s published opinion and need not be repeated here. See United States v. Navarro, 959 F.Supp. 1273 (E.D.Cal.1997).
I begin with a discussion of the standards applicable to a motion to reconsider, and then applying those standards either address or decline to consider the substantive issues which…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- United States v. Anthony NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.