Legal Opinion

Villarreal v. Texas Farmers Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1974No. 852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This suit involves the uninsured motorist’s provision of the plaintiffs’ own insurance policies. Plaintiffs contend that where the tortfeasor’s insurance carrier cannot respond sufficiently in damages to a valid judgment of the injured parties, the uninsured motorist’s provisions contained in their respective automobile policies should cover their loss to the extent of its coverage. The insurance companies’ motions for summary judgment were granted. The plaintiffs appeal to this Court.

Plaintiff Elias Villarreal was driving his vehicle in which his wife and Romeo and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Smiley v. Estate of ToneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kemp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Continental Insurance Co. v. WallaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Wilbourn v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Simmons v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Emery Ex Rel. Hietfeld v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lotoszinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API