Legal Opinion

Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Royal Globe Insurance

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided September 23, 1999No. 5:97-cv-00569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, District Judge.

In previous order granting the motion of plaintiff Briggs & Stratton (“B & S”) for partial' summary judgment, the court found that Georgia law applies to construction of an excess coverage liability policy of insurance issued by defendant Transcontinental. We also ruled that under Georgia law remediation conducted by B & S pursuant to a United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Order, and Notice of Violation of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division (“EPD”), constitutes “damages” under the policy.

Now before the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Marilyn M. Mulhall v. Advance Security, Inc., Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arrow Exterminators, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
  2. North River Insurance v. Gibson Technical Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API