Legal Opinion

Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 25, 1988No. Court 84-1-00087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WATSON, Judge:

This action involves the proper classification of plastic figures described as “G.I. Joe Action Figures” and imported from Hong Kong during 1982 and 1983. The merchandise was classified as “other dolls” under Item 737.24 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”), at various duty rates, depending upon the date of entry. Plaintiff claims that the importations are properly classifiable as “toy figures of animate objects” under Item A737.40 of the TSUS, which, having met the requirements for duty-free treatment under the Generalized System of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  3. Associated Hobby Mfrs., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Toy Biz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  3. Toy Biz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API