Legal Opinion

Pom Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 17, 2012No. 10-55861PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act bars a Lanham Act claim alleging that the name and labeling of a juice beverage are deceptive.

I

Pom Wonderful LLC produces, markets, and sells bottled pomegranate juice and pomegranate juice blends, including a pomegranate blueberry juice blend. The Coca-Cola Company markets and sells bottled juices and juice blends under the Minute Maid brand. In September 2007, Coca-Cola announced a new product called “Pomegranate Blueberry” or “Pomegranate Blueberry Flavored Blend of 5 Juices.” (The parties dispute the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Asghari v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. Clancy v. Bromley Tea Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Quesada v. Herb Thyme Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Brazil v. Dole Food Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API