Pom Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act bars a Lanham Act claim alleging that the name and labeling of a juice beverage are deceptive.
I
Pom Wonderful LLC produces, markets, and sells bottled pomegranate juice and pomegranate juice blends, including a pomegranate blueberry juice blend. The Coca-Cola Company markets and sells bottled juices and juice blends under the Minute Maid brand. In September 2007, Coca-Cola announced a new product called “Pomegranate Blueberry” or “Pomegranate Blueberry Flavored Blend of 5 Juices.” (The parties dispute the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Asghari v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Clancy v. Bromley Tea Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Quesada v. Herb Thyme Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Brazil v. Dole Food Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.