Legal Opinion

Rosano v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1983No. Civ. 29835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

In these original proceedings, we address the narrow question, in an action for forcible entry, of whether a tenant is entitled to prove up damages for lost profits allegedly incurred after the expiration of his right to lawful possession.

Facts

Joseph Lee Rosano, petitioner and plaintiff in the underlying action, entered into a service station agreement with Union Oil Company of California (Union), defendant in the underlying action and real party in interest herein, wherein Rosano agreed to lease and operate a service station in Indio, California, for a period of three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Walker v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Daluiso v. BooneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stillwell Hotel Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Canavan v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Club Rendezvous v. South Plaza AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API