Legal Opinion

Canavan v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opionion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

JOn the 19th day of August, 1875, James Canavan, who was then the husband of the plaintiff, was the lessee and in the possession of the fifty-vara lot on the southeast corner of Third and Brannan Streets, in San Francisco, and was the owner of all the frame buildings thereon; and on that day he assigned said lease and sold said buildings to the defendant, H. W. Gray. On the same day he signed and delivered to said Gray an instrument in writing, of which the following is a copy: “ This is to certify that I have rented four rooms, upper story, southeast corner Third and Brannan Streets, at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reeder v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Daluiso v. BooneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Allen v. McMillionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Burnham v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API