Legal Opinion

Letcher v. Maloney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1918No. 8825PublishedCited by 11 opinions

' Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckinridge, Judge. Action by James T. Maloney against F.“ R. Letcher and the Canadian Oil & Gas Cortv-pany. Judgment for plaintiff, motion of defendant Letcher for new trial overruled, and lie brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, C.

This action was commenced on the 22d day of October, 1912, it. the superior court of Tulsa county, by James T. Maloney against the plaintiff in error, F. R. Letcher, and the defendant in error Canadian Valley Oil & Gas Company, to recover damages for breach of an oil and gas drilling contract. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff alleges, in substance, in his amended petition, that on the 7th day of September, 1912, he entered into an oral contract with the defendant F. R. Letcher to drill for the said F. R. Letcher an oil well…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Calman v. KreipkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. McConnell v. HoldermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knupp v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Edmonston v. HolderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Terrell Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API