Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Merritt

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1891PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Denver.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

-This was an action brought by appellees Merritt and Grommon against Mollie E. Babcock, .to recover commissions as real estate brokers upon an alleged sale of property of appellant in the city of Denver. Trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, (appellees,) for $237.50. There is no important • conflict in the testimony. At the close of plaintiffs’evidence motion-for a nonsuit was made on behalf of the defendant, which was disallowed by the *85court. The right to recover was based upon the testimony of plaintiffs, which was not seriously controverted by the defense.

The first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Lyon v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Tombs v. AlexanderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Rees v. SpruanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Antisdel v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Colburn v. SeymourSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Ball v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API