Legal Opinion

Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 5, 1915No. 2166PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for, the Eastern Division of the Northern District of.Illinois; Kenesaw M. Landis, Judge. Action for statutory penalties by the United States against the Grand Trunk Railway Company. Judgment for the United States, and defendant brings error. The United States, defendant in error, brought this suit against plaintiff in error to recover a penalty for violation of tho act of June 29, 1906 (U. S. Comp.

Read the full summary

In Error to the District Court of the United States for, the Eastern Division of the Northern District of.Illinois; Kenesaw M. Landis, Judge. Action for statutory penalties by the United States against the Grand Trunk Railway Company. Judgment for the United States, and defendant brings error. The United States, defendant in error, brought this suit against plaintiff in error to recover a penalty for violation of tho act of June 29, 1906 (U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, Supp. 1911, p. 1341), commonly known as the Twenty-Eight Hour Law, and being “An act to prevent cruelty to animals while in…

1Opinion of the CourtKohlsaat, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The pertinent sections, of the statute under which this suit was instituted, omitting the portions not essential to the consideration of the case, provide:

“That no'railroad * * * whose road forms any part of a line of road over which cattle, sheep, swine, or other animals shall be conveyed from one state or territory or the District of Columbia into or through another state, or territory, or the District of Columbia, * * * shall confine the same * * * for a period longer than twenty-eight consecutive hours without unloading the same in a humane manner into…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. The Emily and the CarolineSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
  5. New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. American Surety Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  4. Schmeller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  5. Span v. Jackson-Walker Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API