Rozier v. Lancaster
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.
In our opinion the evidence is unquestionably sufficient to be submitted to the jury on the issue of defendants’ negligence as a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries and damages. The more difficult question is whether the plaintiff’s evidence, taken in the light most favorable to him, together with all inferences favorable to bim which may reasonably be drawn therefrom, so clearly establishes his own negligence as a proximate cause of his injuries and damages that no. other conclusion can reasonably be drawn. Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47; Anderson v. Carter, 272 N.C. 426,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Anderson v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bobbitt v. HaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Black v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Ford v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.