Legal Opinion
Stinnett v. Tam
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 2011No. F057784PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1417Opinion
GOMES, J.
In 1975, the Governor convened the California Legislature in an extraordinary session to consider measures aimed at remedying what he described as “serious problems that had arisen throughout the state as a result of a rapid increase in medical malpractice insurance premiums.” (American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community Hospital (1984) 36 Cal.3d 359, 363 [204 Cal.Rptr. 671, 683 P.2d 670] (American Bank).) As a result, the Legislature enacted the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act of 1975 (MICRA) (Stats. 1975, 2d Ex. Sess. 1975-1976, chs. 1 & 2, pp. 3949-4007), which our…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Dominguez v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Dominguez v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Hughes v. Pham CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Lora v. Lancaster Hospital Corp. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.