Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Pham CA4/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 2014No. E052469MUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/22/14 Hughes v. Pham CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO TRENT HUGHES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E052469 v. (Super.Ct.No. INC048327) CHRISTOPHER PHAM, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API