Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Lawler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1951No. 34099PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for breach of contract for sale of an automobile. The petition alleged that August 8, 1946, plaintiff signed the following contract with defendant:

“Contract to Purchase.
“This is to certify that I have this 8th day of August, 1946 deposited with the Richardson Motors $50.00 for delivery of

1st. Choice Fordor Super Dlx.

2nd. Choice Tudor Super Dlx.

“It is understood that this car will be delivered in accordance with the orders originally taken less any of those who may have cancelled their orders in the mean time.
“s/ C. W. Lawler.
“Richardson Motors.
“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Reliance Life Insurance Co. v. ThayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Fortner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. W. T. Ferguson Lumber Co. v. Hiawatha Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Gustafson & Spencer, Inc. v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Florafax International Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. United States v. TurleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Shawnee Hospital Authority v. Dow Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Quincy Johnston, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Watt Plumbing, Air Conditioning & Electric Inc. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API