Legal Opinion

Watt Plumbing, Air Conditioning & Electric Inc. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1975No. 46340PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.

Watt Plumbing, Air Conditioning and Electric, Inc. (Watt) has appealed from two separate orders' of the trial court. The trial court sustained in part the motions of St. Francis Hospital, Inc., (St. Francis) and Tulsa Rig, Reel Manufacturing Company (Tulsa Rig) for summary judgment. The court also sustained the demurrer of St. Francis to Watt’s amended petition which alleged that St. Francis was liable to Watt for work performed on a quantum meruit basis.

This litigation arose out of the construction of a wing to St. Francis Hospital in Tulsa, Oklahoma. On August 22,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webb v. MoranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Coston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Richardson v. LawlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LK Comstock & Co., Inc. v. Becon Const. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1993
  2. In Re Manchester Gas Storage, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
  3. National Interstate Life Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. Cimarron Exploration Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
  5. In Re Durability, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API