Legal Opinion
Central Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Fox
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 27, 2003No. 1011121PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Central Reserve Life Insurance Company appeals the order by the trial court denying its motion to compel Joyce Fox to arbitrate her claims against Central Reserve. We reverse and remand.
On November 11, 1999, Joyce Fox applied for a health insurance policy with Central Reserve. The application signed by Fox contains the following provision:
"C. By signing below, I acknowledge that:
". . . .
"(iii) Any disputes arising under the Policy are subject to an appeals procedure, including arbitration, which may be binding, depending on state law."
On December 1, 1999, Central Reserve issued and delivered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Polaris Sales, Inc. v. HERITAGE IMPORTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Custom Performance, Inc. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Antoine v. Oxmoor Preservation/One, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Porter Capital Corp. v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Daphne Auto., LLC v. E. Shore Neurology Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.