Legal Opinion

Higbie v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1941No. Civ. 2790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiff brought this action on May 9, 1939, to recover a portion of the money paid by him to the defendant under the system of redemption of property from sale for delinquent taxes and assessments under what is known as the “Ten Payment Account.” (See secs. 3817c, 3817c2, 3817c3, 3817c4, 3817c5, Political Code.) A demurrer to the complaint was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiff declined to amend and a judgment was entered against him from which this appeal was taken.

Plaintiff was the owner of property in the city of Inglewood, in the county of Los Angeles, upon which the money sought…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re WeisbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Sans Souci v. DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. County of Sacramento v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. TE Connolly, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Alco Plating Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API