Legal Opinion

Town of Kittery v. Hoyt

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 8, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

291 A.2d 512 (1972)

TOWN OF KITTERY

v.

Ernest F. HOYT and Carol Hoyt.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

June 8, 1972.

Duncan A. McEachern, Kittery, for plaintiff.

James H. Dineen, Kittery, Richard E. Dill, Portsmouth, N. H., for defendants.

Before DUFRESNE, C. J., and WEBBER, WEATHERBEE, POMEROY, WERNICK and ARCHIBALD, JJ.

WEATHERBEE, Justice.

A Justice in the Superior Court has enjoined the Defendant Mr. Hoyt from a use of Mr. and Mrs. Hoyt's property which he found not to be permitted under the municipal zoning ordinance of the Town of Kittery and he also issued a qualified order against both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Piper v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Hancock v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Lemp v. Township of MillburnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  5. Maurer v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF BOOTHBAY, ETC. v. RussellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Toussaint v. Town of HarpswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. Lancaster Yellow Cab & Baggage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Ruhnke v. CantrellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Town of Milford v. BottazziSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API