Legal Opinion

Ruhnke v. Cantrell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1977No. 92804, SC 24768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, Justice Pro Tempore.

Plaintiff appeals from a decree of the circuit court denying her request to enjoin defendant from operating a business in an area zoned for residential use.

Plaintiff is an owner of residential property on Mapleton Drive in the city of West Linn. Defendant owns property approximately seven blocks further up Mapleton Drive where he lives and conducts an excavation business. Both properties are within an area zoned for residential use (R-10).

Plaintiff contends that defendant’s operation of his business at his home violates the zoning ordinance. Defendant claims that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Szmigiel v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Hancock v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Yunker v. MeansOregon Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Milford v. BottazziSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API