Legal Opinion

Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1959No. Appeal, No. 178PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

Mary Boreth, appellant, filed an application for a use registration permit to operate a beauty shop in the basement of her premises. The application was refused and the zoning board, after a public hearing, also refused to issue the permit to her. Thereafter, she took an appeal to the court of common pleas contending that the operation of her beauty shop is a “home occupation” as that term is defined in the Philadelphia ordinance. From an order dismissing her appeal, she took the present appeal.

The appellant is co-owner, with her husband, of premises 1247 Levick…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sterling v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Department of Licenses & Inspections v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Bonasi v. Haverford Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Gold v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Szmigiel v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Agnew v. Bushkill Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Page v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Perez v. Borough of Kennett SquareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Platts v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Bradford WoodsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API