Legal Opinion

Lancaster Yellow Cab & Baggage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1796 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Bogeks,

Carlos Ortiz, Jr., and William Bodrigues, who plan to do business under the fictitious name of Bluebird Taxi Company, filed an application for a certificate of public convenience to engage in the taxicab business in the City of Lancaster and within ten miles of the city limits. Three other enterprises engaged in the business protested and two, Lancaster *162Yellow Cab and Baggage, Inc. and Model Management Service, Inc., trading as Friendly Taxi Service, have appealed from the final order of the Pnblic Utility Commission adopting the decision of Administrative Law Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnstown-Pittsburgh Express, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission & W. C. McQuaide Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Radio Telephone Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Town of Kittery v. HoytSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Smith v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Yellow Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Elite Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API