Legal Opinion
McNulty v. Borden, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 21, 1982No. Civ. A. 76-3952PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial in this action tried before a jury on January 19-23 and 26-28, 1981. Plaintiff contends, in essence, that the Court’s interrogatories to the jury and the jury instructions were confusing and misleading, with the result that the jury’s answer to the second interrogatory was other than the one intended. Plaintiff also questions the necessity of the second interrogatory. Plaintiff further maintains that the Court erroneously granted a Rule 50 motion by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Boisjoly v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1988
- Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Joanne Robles v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Morris v. Rental Tools, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.