Legal Opinion

Joanne Robles v. Exxon Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1989No. 88-2590PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This is a tale of two verdicts. The district court refused to enter judgment for the defendant, Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”), on the first verdict on the ground that juror testimony, received after the jury had rendered its verdict, indicated that the jury’s answers to two special interrogatories were the result of the jury’s failure to understand the court’s instructions. Instead, the court ordered the jury to resume its deliberations. After the jury returned a second verdict, this time in favor of the plaintiff, Joanne Robles, the court entered judgment for her.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Elvis Griffin v. Victor Matherne and Otto Candies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Munn v. AlgeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo AvilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Johnson v. ST. DOMINICS-JACKSON MEM. HOSP.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Betty Karl v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API