Legal Opinion

Lamy v. Jack Jarvis & Co., Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1978No. 417-935, SC 24771PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, J., Pro Tempore.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered after a trial to the court. In its findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court found that defendant owed plaintiff $163.68 and that plaintiff owed defendant $273.38 under a counterclaim. The judgment entered by the trial court offset the plaintiff’s recovery, dismissed the complaint and awarded defendant $109.70. Plaintiff appeals, contending that he was entitled to certain statutory penalties which the trial court denied. Defendant cross-appeals, claiming the court should have awarded a further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hekker v. Sabre Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jenkins v. AAA Heating and Cooling, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wallowa Valley Stages, Inc. v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Wyatt v. Body Imaging, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Wyss v. InskeepCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Platt v. PlattWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API