Legal Opinion

State v. Bao Dinh Dang

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 12, 2012No. 65537-0-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 — A trial court may revoke the conditional release of a person acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity if the court determines that the person did not adhere to the terms or conditions of his or her release, or that the person presents a threat to public safety. Here, the trial court revoked Bao Dinh Dang’s conditional release based on its determination that Dang violated a condition of his release. Given this determination, the trial court was not required to find that Dang was a substantial danger to other persons or presented a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Seattle v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Bao Dinh DangWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Bao Dinh DangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. Bao Dinh DangWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Bao Dinh DangWashington Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API