State v. Bao Dinh Dang
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 — A trial court may revoke the conditional release of a person acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity if the court determines that the person did not adhere to the terms or conditions of his or her release, or that the person presents a threat to public safety. Here, the trial court revoked Bao Dinh Dang’s conditional release based on its determination that Dang violated a condition of his release. Given this determination, the trial court was not required to find that Dang was a substantial danger to other persons or presented a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Seattle v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Bao Dinh DangWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Bao Dinh DangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. Bao Dinh DangWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Bao Dinh DangWashington Supreme Court · 2013