State v. Bao Dinh Dang
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 In this case, we must determine whether trial courts are required to enter a finding of dangerousness before revoking the conditional release of a person acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity. We must also decide the appropriate standard of proof governing the revocation determination. We conclude that consistent with due process principles, our statutory scheme governing *871insanity acquittals, chapter 10.77 RCW, requires trial courts to find conditionally released insanity acquittees dangerous before committing them to mental institutions against their will. We also conclude that a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DerenoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Cavit MumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Jeffrey J. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.