State v. Dahl
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.
Dwight Dahl challenges the trial court’s order revoking his Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA) sentence. Dahl contends that the trial court revocation hearing violated his right to due process. We *680agree and accordingly direct the trial court to conduct a new hearing to determine whether Dahl violated the terms of his SSOSA sentence.
FACTS
Dahl pleaded guilty to Rape of a Child in the First Degree after confessing to sexually abusing his stepdaughter. The trial court sentenced Dahl to a standard range sentence of 95 months. However, the court suspended all but six months of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- McCallum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Edward Eugene PennCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Detention of StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RafayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.