Legal Opinion

Michalke v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1916No. 6637PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Bee County Court; T. M. Cox, Judge. Action by W. C. Brown and another against H. R. Miehalke. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSwearingen, J.

Plaintiffs, W. C. and Guy Brown, alleged: That W. C. Brown executed a note for §76.89 payable to defendant, H. R. Miehalke, dated November 14, 1911, and payable on or before January 1, 1912, together with interest at 10 per cent, from its date until paid. That on December 18, 1911, tbe wife of plaintiff W. C. Brown paid this note and received a receipt for tbe payment. That defendant, Miehalke, on tbe 2Sth day of August, 1914, instituted a suit in tbe county court to recover judgment on four promissory notes alleged to have been executed by plaintiff W. C. Brown in favor of Miehalke, and bad…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of Galveston v. GorhamTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. San Antonio National Bank v. McLaneTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. City Bank of Houston v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Pulliam v. PulliamUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
  5. Smith v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Houston Nat. Exch. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Shelton v. TriggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Clark v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Rohn v. GilmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API