Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. Pulliam

United States Circuit Court

Decided February 12, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. See the former opinion delivered in this cause, ante, 23, for the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Hammond, D. J.

This cause comes again before me on exceptions to the report of the special master, John B. Clough, Esq., and on a petition for rehearing as to the question of the money paid to Joel L. Pulliam after the bar of the statute in favor of dead men’s estates.

I find it unnecessary to determine whether a petition for rehearing can be heard at this stáge of the cause. The former decree was only interlocutory, for an account, and on final hearing all questions are open. Fourniquet v. Perkins, 16 How. 82.

LOSSES ON COTTON.

The executor excepts to the master’s charge of §6,730.35, losses on…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Malin v. County of LamoureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Scherber v. Probate Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Goodno v. HotchkissDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1916
  4. American Surety Co. v. BlakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Michalke v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API