Legal Opinion

San Antonio National Bank v. McLane

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1902No. 1139PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. The bank sued McLane and Mackey and recovered judgment from which McLane alone appealed. The judgment being reversed and rendered for appellant, appellee obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, Associate Justice

suit was instituted on the 31st day of December, 1900, by the plaintiff in error against H. H. McLane and Mary J. Mackey, in the District Court of the Forty-fifth Judicial District of Bexar County. The plaintiff’s petition alleged, in substance, that it was the owner and holder of two promissory notes executed by Nelson Mackey, each for $2500, which were due and unpaid; that the said Mackey had departed this life; that Mary J. 'Mackey was independent executrix of his last will; and asked judgment against Mrs. Mackey as executrix for the notes. The petition alleged that the two notes sued on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. City Bank of Houston v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. New Braunfels Factory Outlet Center, Inc. v. IHOP Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Malakoff Gin Co. v. RiddlespergerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Brinker v. Wobaco Trust Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Eldridge v. EldridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API