Legal Opinion

Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1962No. Docket 57-61, Calendar 49,485, 49,498-49,501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

The principal question presented in this appeal is whether certain actions taken by the school districts of Marine City, East China township and city of St. Clair wore consolidation proceedings or annexation proceedings within the meaning of the school code of 1955. At a higher level of abstraction, the principal question can be stated as follows: Can school districts be joined by following the statutory requirements for annexation 2 which require only the affirmative action of the annexing district’s school board and the favorable vote of the electorate of the annexed district, rather than…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. England v. EckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. England v. EckleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Connine v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Evans v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. The Detroit Edison Company v. East China Township School District No. 3Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API