Legal Opinion

England v. Eckley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1959No. Nos. 30226, 30227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

These are two mandamus proceedings brought separately by two different groups of citizens and taxpayers of Consolidated School District No. 2 of Audrain County (hereinafter “C-2”) to compel the members, clerk and secretary of the board of directors of C-2 to. post notices, advertise and conduct an election on the proposition of changing the boundaries of the school district in accordance with petitions to remove certain lands from C-2 and add them to Centralia Reorganized School District No. 6 of Boone County (hereinafter “R-6”). Petitioners proceeded under section…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunter v. De Luxe Drive-In TheatersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. School Dist.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Reorganized School District R-2 of Newton County v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Maumee School Township v. School Town of Shirley CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Williams Township's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. England v. EckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Ridings v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  3. State ex inf. Dalton v. EckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State ex inf. Dalton ex rel. Reorganized School District No. 4, Jackson County v. School District No. 30 of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API