England v. Eckley
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
These are two mandamus proceedings brought separately by two different groups of citizens and taxpayers of Consolidated School District No. 2 of Audrain County (hereinafter “C-2”) to compel the members, clerk and secretary of the board of directors of C-2 to. post notices, advertise and conduct an election on the proposition of changing the boundaries of the school district in accordance with petitions to remove certain lands from C-2 and add them to Centralia Reorganized School District No. 6 of Boone County (hereinafter “R-6”). Petitioners proceeded under section…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunter v. De Luxe Drive-In TheatersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. School Dist.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State ex rel. Reorganized School District R-2 of Newton County v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Maumee School Township v. School Town of Shirley CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Williams Township's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- England v. EckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Ridings v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- State ex inf. Dalton v. EckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- State ex inf. Dalton ex rel. Reorganized School District No. 4, Jackson County v. School District No. 30 of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960