Legal Opinion
Detroit Edison Co. v. East China Township School District No. 3
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 5, 1965No. Civ. A. 25702PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs’ suit is for a declaration under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that the annexation of two school districts to the district in which their property is situated is in violation of the federal constitution. They seek a further declaration that the assumption of the large bonded indebtedness of the annexed school districts by the combined larger district is in violation of both the federal constitution and state law.
The court now has before it a motion for summary judgment by defendants on the ground that the federal court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Curtis v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.