Legal Opinion
Carey v. Haddock
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 2008No. 20A03-0611-CV-556PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
NAJAM, Judge.
Russell N. Carey and Lisa Carey (collectively, “the Careys”) have filed a petition for rehearing asking that we reconsider our holding that their appeal is moot because they have accepted Susan J. Haddock’s payment in satisfaction of the judgment. See Carey v. Haddock, 877 N.E.2d 842 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). In particular, the Careys assert that the trial court’s docket entries showing that their trial counsel filed a release of judgment against Haddock and obtained Haddock’s payment are erroneous entries. We grant the Careys’ petition but deny their requested…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brockmann Enterprises, LLC v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Carey v. HaddockIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark County Drainage Board and Clark County Board of Commissioners v. Robert IsgriggIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Peabody Energy Corp., Peabody Coal Co., LLC, and Black Beauty Coal Co. v. Richard F. Roark and Beelman Truck Co., and North American Capacity Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Darryl Shepherd v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Darnell Tinker v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Indiana Newspapers, Inc., d/b/a The Indianapolis Star v. Jeffrey M. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.